Administrative toolbar

PR-M: The Peer Review Model

Francisco Grimaldo, Mario Paolucci
Submitted By: fgrimaldo
Submitted: Nov 10, 2013
Last Updated: Jul 1, 2015
231 Downloads (46 Downloads in the last 3 months)
Latest Version

The conceptualization of the peer review process presented in this model identifies the following three key entities: the paper, the scientist and the conference. The paper entity is the basic unit of evaluation and it refers to any item subject to evaluation through a peer review process, including papers, project proposals and grant applications. The simplest way to represent it is to attribute a simple quality value to each paper that compresses the multifaceted and different areas that compose scientific merit. We consider this approximation suitable for the current purposes of the model, leaving for future expansions the consideration of multidimensional factors such as topic, technical quality or novelty. Scientist entities write papers, submit them to conferences (as we define them below) and review papers written by others. Regarding paper creation, the quality value of a paper will depend on the scientific and writing skills of the authors. Scientists will also be characterized by the reviewing strategies adopted by them during the evaluation process. The conference entity refers to any evaluation process using a peer review approach. Hence, it covers most journal or conference selection processes as well as the project or grant evaluations conducted by funding agencies. Every paper submitted to a conference is evaluated by a certain number of scientists that are part of its scientific committee. Thus, the conference is where all the process comes together and where a number of questions arise, such as: what effects do different reviewing strategies produce on the quality of accepted papers? This peer review model is meant to tackle this kind of questions by concretizing the different issues introduced for the general entities presented above.

This model is associated with a publication:

Paolucci, M., Grimaldo. F. (2014). Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism. Scientometrics, 9(3). Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-014-1239-1

Cite This Model:
Grimaldo, Francisco, Paolucci, Mario (2014, June 16). "PR-M: The Peer Review Model" (Version 2). CoMSES Computational Model Library. Retrieved from: https://www.openabm.org/model/4025/version/2
 

Model Status

You are viewing an old version of this model with out-of-date file downloads. To view the latest model version, click the "Latest" button above.

Model Version: 2
Version Notes:

Platform:
Jason 1.4.0a
Programming Language: Java 1.7
Operating System: Platform Independent
Licensed Under: GNU GPL, Version 3
Instructions on Running This Model:
The Peer Review Model (PR-M) can be run using the Jason Eclipse Plugin, the JEdit editor that comes with Jason and from the command line. For more details, see the documentation file, which describes the sample launcher files provided by the PR-M along with the parameters to be set.

Model Files
Available Model Versions
Version Number Submitted
1 11/10/2013
2 06/16/2014
3 07/1/2015
Community Comments

No comments have been posted yet for this version. You must be logged in to post a comment: Log In.